Business Contracts · August 2, 2026

Drafting Indemnity Caps, Baskets, and Carve-Outs

An indemnity clause can shift substantial costs between contracting parties, but its practical effect often depends on the limits surrounding it. A cap sets a ceiling, a basket determines when payment obligations begin, and a carve-out creates an exception. For California businesses and individuals negotiating commercial agreements, these provisions should work together. This article explains how to structure an indemnification cap carve out, distinguish different baskets, and address defense costs without creating conflicting obligations.

Start with the scope of indemnification

Before negotiating dollar limits, identify what the indemnity covers. A provision addressing third-party lawsuits ordinarily serves a different purpose from one covering direct losses caused by a breach between the contracting parties. State whether the clause covers third-party claims, direct claims, or both, rather than relying on broad language about “all losses.”

Also identify the triggering events: breach of a representation, failure to perform a contractual duty, intellectual property infringement, or another specified risk. Define recoverable losses and explain whether they include reasonable attorney fees, settlements, judgments, and investigation expenses.

California Civil Code section 2778 supplies default rules for interpreting indemnity agreements unless a contrary intention appears. Under section 2778(4), the default duty to defend concerns actions or proceedings brought against the indemnitee involving matters embraced by the indemnity, typically third-party claims. It does not automatically require defense of first-party contract disputes; coverage of direct claims and any defense obligation concerning them depend on the agreement’s language. Express drafting matters because an agreement’s wording can change how these defaults apply.

A focused business contract review should examine the indemnity alongside warranties, insurance requirements, remedies, and the general limitation of liability. Reviewing the indemnity alone can miss conflicting provisions elsewhere in the agreement.

Define the cap and how it is calculated

A cap should identify both the maximum exposure and the obligations subject to that ceiling. Saying “liability shall not exceed fees paid” leaves important questions unanswered: which fees, paid by whom, and during what period?

  • Fixed cap: A stated dollar amount that does not change with contract revenue.
  • Fee-based cap: A defined multiple or percentage of fees paid or payable during a specified period.
  • Aggregate cap: One ceiling covering all qualifying claims, rather than a separate limit for each claim.
  • Separate cap: A distinct ceiling for a particular risk, such as confidentiality breaches.

For recurring services, specify whether the measurement period precedes the incident, the claim notice, or another date. Explain what happens early in the relationship, when little has been paid. A minimum dollar floor may prevent the cap from becoming nominal during startup.

Clarify whether the cap covers indemnification only or all contractual liability. If a general liability cap excludes indemnity while the indemnity section includes its own cap, say expressly which provision controls.

Choose a basket that matches the transaction

A basket postpones recovery until qualifying losses reach a stated threshold. It is common in acquisition agreements but can appear in other commercial arrangements. The label alone does not explain the calculation.

  • Deductible basket: Recovery begins only for losses above the threshold. With $70,000 in qualifying losses and a $50,000 basket, the recoverable amount is $20,000 before applying other limits.
  • Tipping basket: Once the threshold is crossed, recovery includes qualifying losses from the first dollar. Under the same example, that means $70,000 before other limits.
  • Individual claim threshold: Small claims are excluded or counted differently before the aggregate basket is calculated.

Specify whether losses equal to the threshold trigger recovery, whether related claims are grouped, and whether excluded small claims count toward the basket. Identify any claims that bypass it. A fraud exception to the cap does not automatically create a fraud exception to the basket.

Draft each indemnification cap carve out precisely

A carve-out removes a specified obligation from a limit. Common negotiation topics include fraud, intentional misconduct, confidentiality, intellectual property claims, and unpaid fees. Listing them without defining their treatment can create more uncertainty than the cap resolves.

For construction contracts, also review California Civil Code sections 2782, 2782.05, and related provisions before drafting an exception. Depending on the contract type, parties, and applicable statutory requirements, these provisions restrict or invalidate specified indemnity and defense obligations involving the promisee’s sole or active negligence, willful misconduct, design defects, and residential construction-defect claims. A carve-out cannot make an otherwise prohibited obligation enforceable.

For each exception, answer three questions:

  1. Does it bypass the cap, the basket, a damages exclusion, or all three?
  2. Is liability uncapped, or does a higher separate cap apply?
  3. Whose conduct triggers the exception, and what connection must that conduct have to the claimed loss?

For example, an intellectual property exception might apply only to third-party infringement claims involving specified deliverables, not every dispute mentioning intellectual property. A confidentiality exception should state whether it also covers contractual data-security obligations.

California Civil Code section 1668 declares contracts contrary to public policy when they directly or indirectly exempt a party from responsibility for its own fraud, willful injury to another’s person or property, or violation of law, whether willful or negligent. A liability cap, not just a complete release, may be invalid if it effectively exempts responsibility for willful injury. California law also generally bars prospective releases of gross negligence. Ordinary-negligence limitations may be enforceable in commercial settings, but enforceability depends on the circumstances, including applicable statutes and public policy. A negotiated cap should not be assumed to override these restrictions.

Coordinate defense costs, claim procedures, and other remedies

State whether defense costs reduce the cap. If they do, explain what happens when those costs exhaust it while a lawsuit remains pending. If they do not, the total financial exposure may exceed the stated indemnity ceiling.

Claim procedures should address notice, selection of counsel, control of the defense, cooperation, conflicts of interest, and settlement consent. Distinguish an obligation to defend from an obligation to reimburse losses. Unless the agreement provides otherwise, California Civil Code section 2778(4), as interpreted in Crawford v. Weather Shield Manufacturing, Inc., generally requires the indemnitor to assume the defense upon the indemnitee’s request or tender of an action within the indemnity’s scope. That duty can arise before liability is established, while the separate duty to indemnify ordinarily depends on the resulting loss or liability. Applicable construction-contract statutes may restrict these obligations.

Finally, coordinate the indemnity with damages exclusions and exclusive-remedy language. Specify how recoverable third-party payments interact with exclusions for consequential damages. Clear terms can reduce interpretation disputes, although they cannot eliminate the possibility of business litigation.

Talk to a California business attorney

Itkin Law offers a free consultation for California businesses and individuals evaluating indemnity caps, baskets, and exceptions in commercial agreements. Schedule a free consultation or call (424) 603-8888.

This article is attorney advertising and provides general information only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. The law changes, and this article reflects the law as of its publication date. Every situation is different — contact us to discuss how the law applies to your exact circumstances. See our full disclaimer.

Free Consultation

Ready to move? Start with a free consultation.

Tell us what you're facing — a contract, a dispute, a debt, a decision. We will map the legal path in plain language, and you will leave the first call knowing your options.

Call Now Free Consultation